Bay City After 6

Somehow, and I don't quite understand why, the idea of networking has become dominated by business and chambers of commerce. There's nothing wrong with their version of networking, but sometimes it seems like people doing chamber-type networking are only concerned about collecting the most business cards and working on their elevator pitch. It seems to me that networking should be more about just meeting people and getting to know them. If I meet someone and there is a chance to work together, so much the better, but I think getting to know people is reward enough. They don't need to hear my elevator pitch.

I've been working with Jenna Schrumpf of Dobson Home Health Care the past few weeks and our pet project is creating an informal networking group for professional-types. We initially started talking about it because we were both surprised that the Bay Area Chamber of Commerce didn't offer a young professionals group similar to the groups in Midland and Saginaw*.

Jenna and I decided that we'd go ahead and start a group of our own and see if anybody was interested. As we started talking to a few people about it, we were surprised that a number of people were more interested in a non-Chamber group. It isn't anything against the Chamber, but people seem to want something a little bit different. So we created Bay City After 6.

My beef with many YP groups is that they all have an age requirement of something like 25–40. Maybe it's just me being overly sensitive since I will be 40 years old in a few days, but I think putting an age limit—even if it's just a guideline—is discriminatory. What happens when I turn 41? Do I have to go to Carnival? It's kind of like refusing to call your group the Old Boys Club, but requiring a Y-chromosome to belong.

Bay City After 6 is focused on the social aspects of networking. Maybe it will benefit your business, too, but that is only because growing your group of friends and acquaintances will benefit your whole life. Initially we are just planning on having a couple of happy hours and talking to everyone who shows up (assuming anyone shows up, that is) about what it is they would like to see happen both with the group and in the Tri-Cities (I still can't bring myself to use the other name).

We aren't planning any business functions, but if people seem interested in having meetings with actual speakers and such, we can do that (in fact, we've already had one professional speaker/motivator offer his services). It's our group, we can do anything we like.

Our first meeting will be held this Thursday, April 2nd, at Midland Street Jack's (formerly Lumberjack's) on Midland Street in Bay City. Anybody and everybody is welcome to join. Also, the link above takes you to our Facebook page. We are probably going to get a blog going in the next couple of weeks, so we'll keep you updated.

Hope to see you on Thursday night.

Rebranding the Detroit Lions

Anybody who grew up in Michigan or who follows the NFL is familiar with the logo above and all of the baggage attached to it. It's the logo of the Detroit Lions, a once-proud franchise whose 2008–2009 season was the worst in NFL history. From the Ford family's disastrous ownership to bad management decisions to bad luck, the Lions are in the midst of putting together the worst decade in the history of any NFL franchise.

You can't fire the owners (unfortunately), but you can make a lot of other changes. Along with management changes (several of which weren't really much of a change) and a lot of personnel changes, the Lions have decided to scrap the old-style Detroit Lions logo (above) and replace it with this:


Sorry for the small size, but it's the best I could find. As you can see, the basic shape of the Lion is still the same, but they've added in some nice broad strokes to give the logo a little more motion. They've also sharpened up the Lion's face, adding an eye and making the snarl more pronounced. It certainly looks a lot tougher and more menacing—now let's wait to see if the team matches up to the logo.

Overall, I like the logo change. I'm pleased that even though this is a big change for them, the didn't go too far. I'm glad they kept the Honolulu blue, as well. I know that some fans don't like the blue very much and don't think it's a very tough-looking color, but it is one of the classic NFL logos. Keeping your traditions intact while giving your franchise a contemporary look is a good way to go about rebranding.

In addition to the logo, they have replaced the old, western-style "LIONS" logotype with this:

I don't love it, but I don't hate it. The old type was really, really dated and always looked out of place to me. This fits in with the new logo and it has a little more motion to it. It's fine.

My only regret in this is that I didn't write about it last week when I first saw a leaked version of the logo. It wasn't the exact logo, but it was pretty close. Had I written about this then, it would be a little more timely. This is still pretty fresh news, but next time I won't sit on the news for a week.

My Brush with Political Greatness

Yesterday was the annual St. Patrick's Day Parade in Bay City. Don't even ask why the parade was on Sunday, the 22nd. I can't make sense of half of the stuff that goes on in Bay City. Anyway, as part of the parade, United States Senator Debbie Stabenow came to town to walk in the parade.

I was in Brewtopia last week and Aaron Bolt—the proprietor and genteman purveyor of fine coffees—told me that Senator Stabenow was going to come to the coffee shop after the parade for a meet-and-greet with the public. I was planning on shooting the parade anyway so I planned on coming to the coffee shop to get a few photos of the Senator in hopes of maybe getting a good shot to include on the studio Wall of Fame (along with Lance Parrish, Tommy Lasorda and Ryne Sandberg).

I figured the place was going to be wall-to-wall because, after all, who wouldn't jump at a chance to meet a sitting U.S. Senator? You may not know this about me, but I am a bit of a political junkie. I used to do some work for a U.S. Congressman (he who shall not be named), but couldn't enjoy the work because his politics were...um...only slightly left of the Kaiser. So the chance to take photos of and maybe meet a politician who I have a lot of respect for was a pretty great opportunity.

As it turns out, while I was shooting the parade I ran into my friend Terry King, who was also taking photos. I mentioned that Senator Stabenow was going to be at Brewtopia so he came along to shoot some photos, too. I'm used to being behind the lens and don't really care much about having my photo taken. Even when I got to hang out with Tommy Lasorda, for example, I didn't bother him for a photo together. I've had the good fortune to meet a lot of interesting and well-known people and athletes and the only two I have ever had a photo taken with are Senator Stabenow and Gordie Howe. Running into Terry was just good luck, though, because it gave me a chance to have my photo taken with the Senator.

We talked a little bit about Bay City and about her hometown of Clare and we touched on Michigan State basketball. We only talked for a few minutes, but it was really a great honor and I'm grateful to the Senator and her staff for taking the time to come to Bay City. I'm also thankful that Aaron let me know the Senator was going to be at Brewtopia. And to round out my Gratitude Trinity, thanks to Terry for taking the photos and getting them to me.

Also, here's an interesting fact...did you know that it is Constitutionally forbidden to appear taller than a member of the U.S. Senate? The Senator is standing on a six-inch platform they keep handy so that she appears taller and more powerful. Okay...I made all of that up. I'm just not very tall.

Rebranding just for the sake of rebranding.

Anybody out there watch Battlestar Galactica? If the answer is no, then Dwight Schrute might want to point out that you're an idiot. I wouldn't go so far, but I do think you have missed out on some pretty great television the past few years. No point in bothering to watch it now, though...the series finale is on tonight.

If the answer is yes, then you know that Battlestar Galactica has been a huge hit for the Sci Fi Channel. I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's probably the highest rated show Sci Fi has ever had. BG isn't the only big series they've ever had, but it has garnered the most critical acclaim as well as created a loyal fanbase as rabid as any in television (with the possible exception of Monty Python stuff).

So what does any network do when they're riding the crest of an all-time high wave?

They decide to rebrand. From now on, the Sci Fi Channel will be called...



That's right...it's Syfy. How very uninspired. Why the big change? According to Syfy president Dave Howe suggested that "Sci Fi" was too generic a term to trademark, so they came up with something which "seeks to distinguish the channel and its programming from cable competitors."

Personally, I always liked Sci Fi's little logo. Everybody knew what the name meant and what the logo was. Creating a new brand at this time seems to be a really goofy decision. Sounds to me like somebody somewhere in the chain felt like they needed to put their stamp on the product. Why does management feel like the product isn't really theirs until they get their fingerprints all over it?

On top of the timing, the logo itself is really pretty sad. Ooohhh...a font. With a 3D look. And a tagline. I mean no disrespect to the people who designed the logo (I don't know who it was just yet) because I am reasonably sure that the execs who made the decision wouldn't know a good logo if it bit them in the ass.

Goodbye, little Saturn and Sci Fi logo, I will miss you.

Imitation

Is imitation really the highest form of flattery? Or is it just lazy design? What I'm referring to in this case are the two logos below. The first is for the TV series Heroes and the second is for Knowing, a new film with Nicolas Cage.





I know they aren't exactly the same, but they're both using the same penumbra-type effect. (Admit it, you're impressed that I know the word penumbra, aren't you?) Heroes was all about saving the world from destruction and from the looks of Knowing, it's got some of the same themes.

I think I'm going to start designing all of my logos based on the Heroes logo. Check back later this week for some Heroes-style work.

It's funny because it's true.

Progress.

Hard to read? Click on comic to see full-size version.

I ran across this comic online today. It's from Penny Arcade. I looked online for rules regarding reposting their comic, but couldn't find anything. I couldn't find an FAQ that forbid reposting of their content, so in hopes that it is easier to ask for forgiveness than permission, I am posting it here.

Please visit their site and buy lots of stuff from them.

Please join me in welcoming our newest client, Affordable Green Energy (AGE). AGE is, as the logo says, an alternative energy solutions company. At the moment, they are really focused on wind energy, but what sets them apart from other alternative energy companies is that they are focused on the small-wind market. They aren't building wind farms, they're manufacturing and installing personal wind turbines, designed for individual homes and businesses.

The analogy that the small-wind industry likes is to refer to it as wind gardening. When you plant a garden, you can meet some (or all) of your needs, but you won't be able to produce enough for your neighbor. It's the same sort of thing with wind gardening.

AGE offers a variety of personal wind turbines, some of which are specifically designed to work better in urban and city environments. The best thing about AGE is that they aren't just selling you a wind turbine and letting you fend for yourself. They take the time to do a complete wind assessment and then put together a plan personalized for you, based on your location and your energy requirements. Once the plan is approved, they not only install the turbines, they will help you with any paperwork that is needed.

AGE is a great example of a local, family-owned company pushing forward with green technology.

Quick note: Just to be clear, so far we have helped them out with some stationery and their new sales material. We did not design their logo or website—I want to be careful to NOT take credit for anyone else's work.

It's awards season. In the past five weeks or so, we've seen the Grammys, Independent Spirit and Academy Awards shows all come and go. I didn't win anything.

Awards aren't limited to the entertainment industry, though. There is also a local award called the Ruby Award. It goes out to like a dozen or so local people who are all making significant contributions to the community. I didn't get one of those, either. And I never will because it's only for people under 40 and since I am turning 40 in about a month, this was the last year that I would have been eligible. Shut out of the Ruby Awards? Was it because I don't make a significant contribution or am I just not under 40 enough? I guess we'll never know.

On top of all of these awards which I will not be winning, there are graphic design and advertising awards—hundreds of them, maybe even thousands—and I won't be winning any of them, either.

Do I feel bad about it? No, not really. I just got thinking about it because almost every day I get another mailer from another organization reminding me of the deadline to enter a design in this contest or that. Some of the awards are legit—I'm looking at you Clio, Addy and Communication Arts—and some are not. Well, it isn't that they aren't legit, but many of them come from organizations you have never heard of before. And every year there are more and more of them. They are like award factories.

The business of charging people to enter design competitions in return for an award is becoming a very big business. It's starting to remind me of the Who's Who scam...you get a free listing in Who's Who in Animal Husbandry or whatever. And for just $15 you can include a photo. $25 more and you get a copy of the book. It's the pay-to-play aspect that I don't care for.

If you go to many designers' sites, you will to see them trotting out their awards. And I don't blame them, they've earned the awards. Moreover, they paid for them. With entry fees running $85 and sometimes more, it gets expensive pretty quickly. That's part of why you see the bigger agencies winning more awards—they can absorb that cost in their overhead because it's a much smaller percentage of their monthly budget. Even a couple of entries a month would be a big chunk for us—realistically the $150 covers my electric and internet bills for a month.

Don't get me wrong, trophies are nice to look at, but does anybody really pay attention? If you go to a large ad agency, one of the first things you see when you walk in the front door is the trophy case. At Integer we had a big case filled with Addys and Clios and so forth. It makes for a nice show if you're doing the dog-and-pony, but does anybody really know what these trophies are? Maybe I will go to the thrift store and buy a bunch of old bowling trophies and just put them up on display in the studio.

I only mention any of this because if you are looking to hire an award-winning designer, I'm not your guy. 989 Design is a small studio and there are just the two of us working here. It's not like a few entries is going to break the bank, but I don't see that the benefit outweighs the cost. What's the best thing that happens when you win an award? You get the respect of your peers, which would be nice, but I don't really need that sort of approval, except from my clients. And I suppose that if someone were hiring a designer based on how many awards they've won, they probably aren't the right fit for 989 Design. Seems a little uptight and that's just not our style.

I'd rather just keep doing good work and doing our best to keep our overhead low. Our goal isn't to be a cheap design studio because that isn't what we are, but keeping our overhead low gives us a little flexibility when it comes to pricing our projects.

If a no-cost competition comes along, maybe we will send something in. In fact, now that I think about it, I have entered one design competition in my career. It was a no-cost-to-enter competition sponsored by a paper manufacturer. I have never printed on a particular stock just to be able to enter a competition, but I happened to use the right stock and I was really proud of how it came out. A few months later I received a package in the mail that informed me that I was, in fact, not a winner. I thought maybe I'd get an honorable mention or something, but not even that. I remember being really disappointed about it, too.

Regarding the image above: I did not draw or create the bottle cap image. I came across it years ago and was not able to find the original source of the art. I wish I had because I'd like to give credit where credit is due, but I guess I'll just have to settle for not taking credit for someone else's work.